Rosemary’s Baby (1968) stacia October 29, 2009 Horror Movie Locations The Dakota, New York City, known as “The Bramford” in Rosemary’s Baby (1968). Share this:Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)Like this:Like Loading... Previous PostVillage of the Damned (1960) Next PostThe Innocents (1961) 4 Comments Zoe November 17, 2009 at 4:45 am 11 years ago ohh what a brilliant Building Leigh Davis June 24, 2010 at 12:13 am 10 years ago I wonder what the rent is like in that place! IF it’s like what I saw in the movie (Rosemary’s baby) then good grief, I could fit my entire suite into the living room! Thing is, though, I’d be a wreck living there! Thank God I can’t have kids anymore, or I’d be scared to death of every elderly couple in that building; wondering if they’d want my struggle actor husband to make a deal; they give him success, they use me to bring satan’s child into the world. Thus is the power of cinema. I won’t go swimming at the beach of Martha’s Vineyard either. Stacia June 25, 2010 at 2:13 am 10 years ago On another forum I go to, I think I saw that someone who inherited an apartment in The Dakota building was prohibited from living there because the owners didn’t think he was classy or rich enough. I’d love to live there, but I most certainly wouldn’t qualify! Leigh Davis June 25, 2010 at 2:25 am 10 years ago Oh my gosh! Really?! That’s so wrong! In my books, as long as a tenant can pay their rent and keeps their place tidy, doesn’t write on the walls or pee in the elevator, I’d be good with him. Couldn’t he dispute it with a rental board or something, or it wouldn’t apply in privately owned apartment buildings? That’s sad! In any case, I definitely would NOT qualify! Comments are closed.