Matter of fact, it’s all dark.

“One of these days I’m going to write a song that makes someone want to cry.”
– Neil Diamond, Teen Screen Magazine, March 1967

 

When The Neil Diamond Collection arrived in the mail last month, I had forgotten I ever ordered it. For most of my 39-ish years, Neil Diamond was simply never on my radar except as a familiar cultural presence, some dude I heard twice a year on the radio but knew nothing about.  Yet something lead me to order that Neil Diamond CD. Curiosity, maybe, or an accident of random firing neurons. Perhaps it was the booze. Oh, did I mention I had consumed half a bottle of Machete before ordering The Neil Diamond Collection? Because I had consumed half a bottle of Machete before ordering The Neil Diamond Collection. My only memory of this is peering at the Amazon screen through eyes gummed up from drink and 12-hour-old mascara. It was a proud moment.

Roughly one week later, sober and trusting that every package delivered to the house contained either happiness or fun or, on really good days, both, I opened the box to find Neil Diamond staring at me.

That photo bothered me, induced an unidentifiable, inexplicable, but very real disturbance. A few days later my husband, who knew I was in the throes of some weird ennui-induced thing improbably triggered by a greatest hits album, kindly turned the album cover around. Now it was a slightly older photo from Diamond’s Greek Theater engagement in 1972. Young, lithe, gorgeous, confident, godlike hair and sad eyes.

That didn’t help.

When I saw these photos, I realized I was not familiar with the Neil Diamond that existed before the beaded blouses and glamour shots album covers. At the same time, I was overwhelmed with the realization that 40 years had passed since I was born and since that greatest hits album photo was taken and holy shit that has been a long time. Time will not stop, loss is inevitable, and what was will never be again.

These are basic concepts, things I figured out decades ago; why was I suddenly having so much trouble accepting them now?

Re-acceptance was not easily had, and after several very shaky days I was nearly unglued. The unidentifiable ennui-induced thing had turned into an unwavering sense of loss and grief. It was an unstable situation, tragicomic in retrospect but mostly frightening at the time. In an effort to ferret out what was happening and with an ill-defined feeling of having forgotten something important, I searched out early Neil Diamond performances and interviews.

It was in that state that I stumbled across a 1971 BBC “Top of the Pops” performance by Neil Diamond.


 
Please, if you have a spare 38-odd minutes of time, watch this. I don’t ask this because I wish gut-wrenching emotional turmoil on you, because I acknowledge that I am odd and different and what happened to me will not likely happen to you. Normal people do not suffer irrational headspins after watching a 40-year-old “Top of the Pops” episode. But I think you will be surprised, maybe even a bit moved, by Diamond’s performance. Within one minute of the show opening he is expressing pure, unadulterated joy at performing with the string section. He’s confident and happy and very much in control of his art. Even when his untrained fingers get tangled in an arpeggio or the lead trumpet cracks on an important high note, he’s completely together. As much as he wants to hide those gangly arms behind his guitar, as hard as it is for him to force his eyes open and face the crowd or finish a particularly raw lyric, he does it.

Neil Diamond has said songwriting is the hardest part of his work, performing the easiest, but I am not convinced that live performance has ever been easy for him. There are numerous early television appearances where Diamond is obviously uncomfortable. Watch his eyes on this 1970 “Glen Campbell Goodtime Hour” clip at about 4:25 where he momentarily freaks out after glancing directly at the camera. When he’s not waylaid by nerves, it’s emotion. In the 1971 BBC appearance, he visibly cringes at the end of “I Am…I Said” and very nearly goes silent without finishing the song. Manufactured or genuine, that’s pain writ large upon his face. He’s offering up his soul, and when an artist does this, they ask for your soul in return. At least some of it, at least for a while.

People will forever argue about when Neil changed, but there is no denying that there was a change, a walling-off of emotion coupled with a growing propensity to shake his moneymaker on stage.  Sometime in 1976, after the Thank You Australia Tour in March yet before The Band’s “Last Waltz” concert on Thanksgiving, Neil went from offering his soul to merely displaying it like a museum piece. Yet while he relied on little more than past glories and sex appeal, he continued to expect fans to keep up their half of the artistic soul exchange. The sublime had turned to kitsch, embraced mediocrity to save itself, abandoned its art for the soul-numbing safety of its 17th greatest hits compilation, this time with a bonus demo reel and tiny pictures in the liner notes.

I combed through any interviews, TV appearances, or concert footage I could find from the mid-70s and beyond just for one small sign of the Neil Diamond that used to be. There are tiny little winks of light scattered amongst the decades of debris, but that is all.

It felt more like a betrayal than a revelation, and at random moments over the course of a few days, bits of Diamond’s BBC performance would pop into my head. It was never a welcome memory, instead making me feel as though I just been given some very bad news. More than once I risked giving way to a debilitating scream, a powerful noise that would alter time, change reality, correct the past, destroy evil, win bets and fell a nearby shepherd and his flock.

So I went back to that BBC concert footage to face it, straightened myself up, shoulders back, steeled myself and stood in front of that 1971 Neil Diamond and looked him right in those soft fucking eyes. I was Randolph Fucking Scott and I was not going to run, and man, if you are going to kill me, then you are going to have to do it now.

I did not die, of course. Broken hearts don’t kill.

I’m fond of saying that art which affects me to the point of shredding my emotions has ruined my life, and I’m fond of saying it because it’s the goddamned truth. When this happens, my emotions, philosophy, and spirituality are demolished, the pieces scattered, never put back together the same way again. Sometimes it’s wonderful and exciting, like watching Milton Glaser in To Inform and Delight, or listening to Laurie Anderson narrate Andy Warhol: A Documentary Film, or hearing Pink Floyd’s “Brain Damage/Eclipse” or that Handel sarabande in D minor I love so much. Sometimes, though, it really fucking hurts. The Bad Sleep Well hurt, as did Brave New World and The Sound and the Fury. Rick Danko’s “It Makes No Difference” in The Last Waltz destroys me every time, and I’m certain my sworn lifelong nemesis Elton John wants to kill me dead with the 1977 live “I Feel Like a Bullet (In the Gun of Robert Ford)” — even though he and Ray Cooper fuck up about two minutes in. Especially because they fuck up. Goddammit, Elton. I will get my revenge, you be-sequined bastard.

Once this whole Neil-induced pseudo-breakdown simmered down, there were a lot of things I had to acknowledge. I may imagine myself as a gunslinger facing down evil, beating the bad guys to the draw and saving my own life — soul, really — but that’s not true. At best it’s metaphorically true; all my conflicts are artistic and all the duels one-sided and internal.

Last year I briefly touched on The Bad Sleep Well and how it ruined me. I hesitated for months before posting that entry because I was scared, and frankly I’ve been scared and a little bit lazy my whole life, at least when it comes to writing. And I’ve never honestly examined these Stendahl-like reactions that bite my neck and get tangled in my hair every six months or so. Is it appropriate when I say The Bad Sleep Well killed any lingering hope for humanity I had left? Is it merely drama queening? Is it even real?

Yeah, it’s real. It’s real for me, at least. Maybe it shouldn’t be. Maybe I shouldn’t get so caught up in fictional corruption or Quentin Compson or a “Top of the Pops” performance. But I do get caught up in it, and I’m tired of pretending as though I don’t and avoiding the subject in my writing.

I want to write and I want to be good at it. Writing is not easy for me. When I started this blog, I thought it would afford me practice and experience that would turn me into someone who could produce quality work on a regular basis. Four years on, it was obvious I had not become that magical creature.  As banal as it sounds, all that time spent digging through Neil Diamond interviews inspired me when I didn’t realize I even needed inspiration. He has said that “I Am…I Said” took four months to write, that he’s not an inherently good songwriter and he has to work hard at it. I knew I wasn’t working hard enough at my own writing, digging deep enough, or even doing enough research. Again, it’s banal, but I decided if Neil Diamond can change himself from that goofy scared kid on the “Glen Campbell Goodtime Hour” into the modern day troubadour on the BBC a year later, then maybe I can transform into a decent writer, someone who is respected amongst my peers.

Of course, Neil kept transitioning and didn’t stop, flying in spectacular fashion through a series of phases: Larger-than-life panty-dodging sex god, attention-starved bead-covered sell-out, and finally respected and loved showman who gets to smack the shit out of Jimmy Kimmel. That’s his thing, and though right now I am disappointed in him, I am also sane enough to know that it’s not my place to judge.  Still, I plan on taking his career path as a cautionary tale, although I don’t imagine I’ll ever get to the point where I need people to throw their knickers at me to prove that I’m worthwhile.  Panty throwing is always optional. (It’s not optional.)

After spending about an hour laying in the hallway, staring at the ceiling and tightly hugging Dark Side of the Moon because I failed to get a firm hold on this post — it took me weeks to manage the final sentence — I wonder how hard this is going to be. It’s easy for me to say I should work at writing. It’s not going to be easy for me to actually do it, but I have to, and that means less posts on the blog.  I will still post here because the only thing I’m moderately good at writing is film and cultural criticism, but it will mean less overall posts and hopefully less of the half-formed almost-critiques that I’ve been just barely getting away with. And when I’m not struggling over some epic screed on how Ginger Rogers’ ostrich feather dress represents fascism and the decline of the bourgeoisie, I will still be posting important Regis Toomey updates via The Phantom Creeps recaps, photos, schedules, my Projects and screencaps, because those things are fun.

And now the final sentence that took me so long to write: Wish me luck.

Bookmark the permalink.

26 Comments

  1. Rick Danko's "It Makes No Difference" in The Last Waltz destroys me every timeYou nailed it for me right there.When I eventually publish my long-intended “saddest songs” post, this is the show stopper for me.My breakdown point is “stampeding cattle they rattle the walls.”Followed by excessive weeping at “Well I love you so much, and it’s all I can do, just to keep myself from telling you, that I never felt so alone before.”

  2. Oh god, when Rick's voice cracks on "Well I love you so much, and it's all I can do" I fall to pieces. While I can listen to the song (using a box or two of tissues from crying so hard) I can't bear to watch him perform it anymore.

  3. All I could think about, reading this, is what a strong writer you are.Good luck!(And if you haven't, read The War of Art by Steven Pressfield. It might help the transformation!)

  4. It's the cracking voice that slays me every time.I had the pleasure of meeting Rick before he died and I regret that I didn't tell him how much I love his song.But I would have broken down like a crazed fan!

  5. Cathy, thank you for the compliment and the suggestion! I will definitely look into it.MJ, that's wonderful you got to meet Rick! I don't know what I'd do if I ended up meeting someone who had made a huge impact on me. If I met Milton Glaser for example, a hearty handshake would be appropriate, but I'd probably lose all composure and try to plant a sloppy and undignified (but sincere) kiss on the man's cheek.

  6. Stacia: Here’s a thought. Put this kind of energy and revelatory soul into writing for this blog. It really is as serious as any writing you’ll do. Take my word for it. But advice is a bit beside the point. I really wanted to say what a whopper of a post this was. Really. My jaw dropped open on more than one occasion as a line or a point went right through me. Riffing on Neil Diamond as a trigger for life sadness. That’s brilliant with a capital “B.” God, doesn’t that clip stomp on the heart? I am actually a bit angry at you. Why have you been denying me this expansive energy in your posts all along? Anyway, my dear, Stacia, this was some fine, fine writing. That ennui thing at 40. It only gets worse, you know. At 55, I am assailed with snatches of lost memories unrecalled until the moment: my long dead grandmother tugging my ear with rugged affection, calling me “little boy,” and that making me completely, utterly happy. It’s about a loss of the ability to love life, I think.

  7. I am actually a bit angry at you. Why have you been denying me this expansive energy in your posts all along?I was scared and lazy and didn't really know it. Well, I knew the scared part, but I was masking the lazy part by churning out half-assed posts and forgoing some really keen ideas because they took so much work. In fact, I think the seeds for all this ennui were planted when I remembered this summer that I began this blog to post an epic series on Myra Breckinridge, and idea I abandoned years ago. You don't know how much your reply means to me, Mykal. Thank you.

  8. This. Fucking. Rocks. Seriously, this is worthy of James Agee or Greil Marcus. I wish this was something I'd written. I wish it was something that I was even capable of writing.

  9. Great post. And believe me, I get it. Easy is never easy, especially when you actually give a damn, and you know you do.

  10. Thank you Vulnavia. You're FAR too kind with your comparisons. I don't want to cliche you to death here, but if I can write this then you can as well. I've read your blog; I know.Operator 99, thank you — and you're so right that easy is never easy. I think the word "easy" has been lying to us for a very long time.

  11. Rather brilliant, Stacia! I will wish you luck, because you'll need it – everyone does in any worthy venture – and also because you shouldn't need it, you write wonderfully, but hell, have some luck anyway.

  12. attention-starved bead-covered sell-outMan, I even proof-read this post and that line STILL gets me every time! You really "hit the Neil on the head" with that one :D

  13. Thank you Van! I shall spend your luck capriciously.Vincent: That's enough outta you, mister.

  14. There are countless films, songs, and books that've sent me into a blue funk tailspin for hours, days, weeks, decades, that have left scars both long and deep, but that's not important now. I'm gonna keep this simple.My faith, our faith, in your skills is well justified.Good luck.And I look forward to many more great reads.

  15. My faith, our faith, in your skills is well justified.Thank you, WB. That's kind of you to say. And there's always the knowledge that if I fail, it will probably still be spectacular and entertaining.

  16. Neil Diamond saidOkay, who left the screen door open?

  17. There's a Neil Diamond reference in my upcoming OXFORD AMERICAN column… too scanty to make you happy! It's about how Buckner & Garcia of "Pac-Man Fever" fame were all set to release their love song to E.T. the Extraterrestrial… but Neil stole their thunder!

  18. I'm going to read your article. Hell, I'm probably going to finally subscribe to the magazine, I've been meaning to for over a year.Neil needs more press like that. More vague mentions and "Neil stole someone else's thunder" press, absolutely. I'm very cross with him right now.By the way, I have finished actually reading the last of the scholarly tomes: Rich Wiseman, David Wild, DK Harvey and J Harvey, Grossman et al., and Laura Jackson. None mention Jerry Lewis. Most think the 1980 Jazz Singer was the third remake. I'm very cross with them, too.Mostly with Laura Jackson, who I don't think is a real person. I think it's the pen name of an amalgam of people who collate previously-published information and turn it into a "biography." How else could one person write on average a biography a year for the last 17-odd years?I'm leaving such a long comment on my own blog because I'm procrastinating. It's neat.

  19. Scared and a little bit lazy.Oh god, I relate. This is a great post. Thank you, and good luck.

  20. Thank you Fresca, I appreciate it.

  21. This is what keeps me coming back to your blog. I loved it. I love it when you write from the heart. Men get more sentimental as they get older. Generally not true of women; you are an exception.

  22. Your comment came at just the exact right time, Bruce, and I thank you.

  23. Came back to read this post again—can't get it out of my head–and finally watched some of the 1971 Neil… When he says he just wanted to hear himself on the radio, just once, saying something like "you turn on the radio and know it's you… wow", well, then I got why you love him, and even loved him a bit myself.Or at least related to that fresh faced honesty.(I only ever before knew/saw him as his later rather smarmy self.)

  24. Hi again Fresca!Neil has been on my mind a lot lately, mainly because I've got a sinus infection and have been catching up on my backlog of Neil performances while trying to recuperate. There's a 2008 UK show called "An Evening With Neil Diamond" that is kind of tacky in a decidedly British way — it's an audience of celebrities asking Neil softball questions we've heard the answers to a million times already. But Neil is nervous and he often has the same wide-eyed expression on his face as he did back in 1971 at the BBC performance.

  25. 10/11/2012: For those of you who are experiencing deja vu, this post is from October, 2011. It’s been imported from the old archives over here to the new site.

Leave a Reply